Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part 3 bridges and retaining walls

Seismic analysis and design of retaining walls and shallow. Irs code of practice for the design of sub structures and. Industrial structures including stack like structures part 5. Nchrp report 611 seismic analysis and design of retaining. Earthquake resistant construction linkedin slideshare. Dams and embankments part 1 contains provisions that are general in nature and applicable to all types of structures. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures see other formats fek disclosure to promote the right to information whereas the parliament of india has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in. Jun 23, 2018 criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part 3 bridges and retaining walls. Also, it contains provisions that are specific to buildings only. The earthquake resistant design of structures taking into account seismic data from studies of these indian earthquakes has become very essential, particularly in view of the intense construction activity all over the country. Little formal guidance on the seismic design of retaining walls for residential properties is available at present. Part 2 liquid retaining tanks revision of is 1893part 2 ics 91.

It also contains provisions that are specific to buildings only. For an earthquake resistant structure, one has to follow is. Version 2 november 2014 on the design of retaining. Design of earthquake resistant structures earthquakes. Nevertheless, the second part devoted to seismic design of bridge abutments calls for concepts and definitions presented for retaining walls. Learning earthquake tip 11 earthquake design construction. The provisions of this chapter shall govern the structural design of buildings, structures and portions thereof regulated by this code. Part 1 general provisions and buildings part 2 liquid retaining tanks elevated and ground supported part 3 bridges and retaining walls part 4 industrial structures, including stacklike structures part 5 dams and embankments to be formulated this standard part 1 contains general.

Seismic design of retaining wall is considerably complicated problem in which assumptions have to be considered in order to make indeterminable issue solvable employing theory of statics and differential calculus. Bis is 1893 part 3 criteria for earthquake resistant. Dams and embankments among these only part 1, which deals with general provisions and buildings has been published by bureau of indian standards. Seismic analysis and design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes, and embankments explores analytical and design methods for the seismic design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes, and embankments. Notations and symbols abstract show below hide below describes earthquake resistant design of structures and is applicable to buildings. Read seismic analysis and design of retaining walls. The earthquake effect on retaining walls and bridge abutments are covered. Trbs national cooperative highway research program nchrp report 611. Is 1893 part i, 2002, indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures 5th revision is 4326, 1993, indian standard code of practice for earthquake resistant design and construction of buildings 2nd revision is 827, 1993, indian standard guidelines for improving earthquake resistance of earthen buildings is 828.

Vulnerability atlas of india third edition vulnerability. Finally recommendations have been made for the design of retaining walls and shallow foundations. For the structural design of bridge abutments, both integral and nonintegral, and retaining walls this section shall apply. Permanent displacement based seismic design chart for. Liquid retaining tanks elevated and ground supported c part 3. In contrast, the 1984 edition of is1893 had provisions for all the above structures in a single document. Draft indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant. A comparative study of response reduction factor for seismic design of the bridges. Permanent displacement based design chart have been proposed by franklin and chang for slopes and have been used by richards and elms for the seismic design of gravity retaining. 2002 criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. The report details the development of the design procedures.

The ultimate design wind speed, v ult, for use in the design of risk category i buildings and structures shall be obtained from figure 1609. Revised is code for earthquake resistant design of structures. Read more about earthquake intensity on business standard. Abstract in recent years there have been several failures of retaining walls during. Part 2 liquid retaining tanks elevated and ground supported part 3 bridges and retaining walls part 4 industrial structures including stack like structures part 5 dams and embankments part 1contains provisions that are general in nature and applicable to all structures. Part 1 general provisions for all structures and specific provisions for buildings click here to download pdf is 1893 was split into five parts, namely. Is 1893 part 3 structural design structure mechanics studocu. Not to be reproduced without the permission of bis or used as an indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of strucutres.

Ministry of earth system science national centre for seismology moesncs maintains a national seismological network consisting of 42 digital seismograph stations to measure earthquake magnitude and monitor earthquake. The ultimate design wind speed, v ult, for the special wind regions indicated near mountainous terrain and near gorges shall be in accordance with local jurisdiction requirements. The primary aim of this paper is to suggest a suitable design procedure using a seismic sliding displacement based chart for the design of cantilever retaining walls. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. The characteristics intensity, duration, etc of seismic ground vibrations expected at any location depends upon the magnitude of earthquake, its depth of focus, distance from the epicentre, characteristics of the path through which the seismic waves travel, and the soil strata on which the structure stands. Guidelines for earthquake resistant design of structures. Aug 16, 2017 new zealand is a high earthquake hazard region and earthquake considerations are integral to the design of the built environment in new zealand. This report provides analytical and design methods for the seismic design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes, and embankments. Version 2 november 2014 on the design of retaining structures. Title ced 39 7739 criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. This section excludes the design of earth embankments and slopes for earthquake resistance, which is covered by section 6.

Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part 3 bridges and retaining walls. Revised is code for earthquake resistant design of structures is 1893 part 1. Pdf a comparative study of response reduction factor for. The nzta bridge manual 20 provides guidance on the earthquake resistant design of retaining walls associated with road and highway infrastructure but these structures are generally subject to higher. The choice of design life and earthquake return period, which determine. Part 1 general provisions and buildings this standard contains provisions that are general in nature and applicable to all structures. Design of earthquake resistant structures free download as powerpoint presentation.

New zealand is a high earthquake hazard region and earthquake considerations are integral to the design of the built environment in new zealand. Is 1893 part i, 2002, indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures 5th revision is 4326, 1993, indian standard code of practice for earthquake resistant design and construction of buildings 2nd revision is 827, 1993, indian standard guidelines for improving earthquake resistance of earthen buildings. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure part iii. Provisions for bridges seismic design of bridges in india is covered in. Draft iitkrdso guidelines for seismic design of railway bridges 104 bridges and retaining walls 11 is 920 ductile detailing of reinforced 1993concrete structure subjected to seismic forcescode of practice appendix a ductile detailing specifications clause 17. Design of structures for earthquake resistance part 5. Buildings and structures located within the highvelocity hurricane zone shall comply with the provisions of sections 1605, 1607, 1611, 1616 through 1626, and, as applicable in flood hazard areas, section 1612. The earthquake resistant design of nonintegral bridge abutments and retaining walls for. Alternatively, the following design criteria are to be adopted after carrying the earthquake analysis neglecting the effect of infill walls in other storeys. Development of database and guidelines for the earthquake resistant design of cantilever retaining walls a. The computation of each static and dynamic pressure acting on retaining wall need more research and site selection is becoming codified. Seismic design of earth retaining structures and foundations.

Development of database and guidelines for the earthquake. Bis is 1893 part 3 criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part 3 bridges and retaining walls active, most current. Factors influencing earthquake resistant design of structures. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part 3 bridges and retaining walls a description is not available for this item. Is 1893 part 3 january 1, 2014 criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part 3 bridges and retaining walls a description is not available for this item. Industrial structures including stacklike structures part 4. First, the paper shows that in order to use the quasistatic mononobeokabe analysis for the prediction of earthquake dynamic forces on a gravity retaining wall, wall inertia effects must be included. Earthquake resistant design of structures a brief introduction and presentation. When the floor levels of two similar adjacent buildings are at the same elevation levels, factor r can be taken as r2. Seismic design of retaining structures guidance version 2 17 november 2014 page 3 with an example of a suitable methodology being given as as 46782002, earthretaining structures recommendation given in the commentary to nzs 1170. Pdf seismic displacement of gravity retaining walls.

Chapter 7 retaining walls seismic analysis and design of. The effects of earthquake shaking need to always be considered in geotechnical engineering practice including the design of retaining structures observations of retaining wall performance during earthquakes indicates that wellbuilt retaining walls. Part 5 1 addresses this issue by devoting a section on the earthquake resistant design of retaining structures, while the fundamental methods for stability considerations of. Houston department of civil and environmental engineering, arizona state universiy, usa.